Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Safety and feasibility of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in patients with aqueous deficient dry eye disease.

Møller-Hansen M., Larsen AC., Toft PB., Lynggaard CD., Schwartz C., Bruunsgaard H.

Clinical Trial on Face & Skin, published in Ocul Surf (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Ocul Surf (2020)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33253910
DOI
10.1016/j.jtos.2020.11.013
Citations
54

Abstract (original English)

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of injecting allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) into the lacrimal gland (LG) as a treatment of aqueous deficient dry eye disease (ADDE). In this open-label, 5-visit clinical trial (baseline, treatment and weeks 1, 4 and 16) seven subjects with ADDE received one transconjunctival injection of allogeneic ASCs into the LG in one eye. The ASC product contained 22 million ASCs/ml and the injected volume was maximally 50% of the LG volume as determined on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Treatment related adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each visit (primary endpoint). Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear osmolarity, tear film breakup time (TBUT), corneal staining (Oxford grade) and Schirmer's I test were assessed at each timepoint. No AEs related to the study treatment were observed. Mean follow-up time was 126 days after treatment. The mean OSDI score decreased from 58.9 ± 20.6 at baseline to 34.1 ± 21.6 (p < 0.002). In the study eye mean tear osmolarity decreased from 312.9 ± 10.4 to 291.6 ± 10.9 mosm/l (p < 0.002), mean TBUT increased from 3.7 ± 1.5 to 7.1 ± 1.9 s (p < 0.002), mean Schirmer's I test increased from 4.6 ± 0.7 to 8.1 ± 3.1 mm/5 min (p < 0.03), while mean Oxford grade showed a trend towards a decrease from 2.4 ± 0.7 to 1.3 ± 1 (p < 0.10). Our trial suggests that injection of allogeneic ASCs into t

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Dry Eye SyndromesFeasibility StudiesHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsTears

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research