Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMC

Safety and pharmacokinetics of naringenin: A randomized, controlled, single-ascending-dose clinical trial

Rebello CJ., Beyl RA., Lertora JJL., Greenway FL., Ravussin E., Ribnicky DM.

Clinical Trial on Type 2 Diabetes, published in Diabetes Obes Metab (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Diabetes Obes Metab (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31468636
PMCID
PMC6956701
DOI
10.1111/dom.13868
Citations
110

Abstract (original English)

Aims To evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of naringenin in healthy adults consuming whole-orange (Citrus sinensis) extract. Methods and methods In a single-ascending-dose randomized crossover trial, 18 adults ingested doses of 150 mg (NAR150), 300 mg (NAR300), 600 mg (NAR600) and 900 mg (NAR900) naringenin or placebo. Each dose or placebo was followed by a wash-out period of at least 1 week. Blood safety markers were evaluated pre-dose and 24 hours post-dose. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Serum naringenin concentrations were measured before and over 24 hours following ingestion of placebo, NAR150 and NAR600. Four- and 24-hour serum measurements were obtained after placebo, NAR300 and NAR900 ingestion. Data were analysed using a mixed-effects linear model. Results There were no relevant AEs or changes in blood safety markers following ingestion of any of the naringenin doses. The pharmacokinetic variables were: maximal concentration: 15.76 ± 7.88 μM (NAR150) and 48.45 ± 7.88 μM (NAR600); time to peak: 3.17 ± 0.74 hours (NAR150) and 2.41 ± 0.74 hours (NAR600); area under the 24-hour concentration-time curve: 67.61 ± 24.36 μM × h (NAR150) and 199.05 ± 24.36 μM × h (NAR600); and apparent oral clearance: 10.21 ± 2.34 L/h (NAR150) and 13.70 ± 2.34 L/h (NAR600). Naringenin half-life was 3.0 hours (NAR150) and 2.65 hours (NAR600). After NAR300 ingestion, serum concentratio

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansCitrusFlavanonesPlant ExtractsMetabolic Clearance RateAdministration, OralArea Under CurveCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDose-Response Relationship, Drug

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research