Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Safety and tracking of intrathecal allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in healthy and diseased horses.

Barberini DJ., Aleman M., Aristizabal F., Spriet M., Clark KC., Walker NJ.

Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 3 on Back & Spine, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2018)
Country
England
Reported sample size
3
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29631634
DOI
10.1186/s13287-018-0849-6

Abstract (original English)

It is currently unknown if the intrathecal administration of a high dose of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is safe, how MSCs migrate throughout the vertebral canal after intrathecal administration, and whether MSCs are able to home to a site of injury. The aims of the study were: 1) to evaluate the safety of intrathecal injection of 100 million allogeneic adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs); 2) to assess the distribution of ASCs after atlanto-occipital (AO) and lumbosacral (LS) injection in healthy horses; and 3) to determine if ASCs homed to the site of injury in neurologically diseased horses. Six healthy horses received 100 × 10 6 allogeneic ASCs via AO (n = 3) or LS injection (n = 3). For two of these horses, ASCs were radiolabeled with technetium and injected AO (n = 1) or LS (n = 1). Neurological examinations were performed daily, and blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were evaluated prior to and at 30 days after injection. Scintigraphic images were obtained immediately postinjection and at 30 mins, 1 h, 5 h, and 24 h after injection. Three horses with cervical vertebral compressive myelopathy (CVCM) received 100 × 10 6 allogeneic ASCs labeled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) via AO injection and were euthanized 1-2 weeks after injection for a full nervous system necropsy. CSF parameters were compared using a paired student's t test. There were no significant alter

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsCell MovementCells, CulturedCerebrospinal FluidFemaleHorse DiseasesHorsesMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research