Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

"SAVE"-Shock-Assisted Viable Extraction: A Minimally Manipulative Method of Processing Regenerative Cells for Clinical Use.

Del Vecchio D., Vranis N., Alevrogianni K., Theodorou S.

Laboratory Study, published in Aesthet Surg J Open Forum (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39790718
PMCID
PMC11712265
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojae112

Abstract (original English)

Background Extraction of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) has gained significant attention lately in the realm of regenerative medicine. However, finding highly efficient methods of extraction that also comply with the US regulations has prevented widespread clinical use. Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel ASC extraction device to quantify viable ASC extraction and processing efficiency. Methods SVF extracted from abdominal fat samples and processed using a novel shock-assisted viable extraction (SAVE) device was tested for stem-cell count and viability. Additionally, time required for processing was recorded. Results Twelve adipose samples were utilized for this study. After a mean time of 3 min, cell count yield ranged of 47,400 to 189,400 of viable regenerative cells per cc, with an average of 122,464 viable regenerative cells per cc. Conclusions SAVE is a novel fat-processing technique with high stem-cell extraction that shows promise from a regulatory, yield, time efficiency, and cost perspective. Level of evidence 5 therapeutic

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.