Scaffolds Mimicking the Tumor Microenvironment for In Vitro Malignancy Models
Rosellini E., Cascone MG.
Narrative Review, published in Biomimetics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomimetics (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41149224
- PMCID
- PMC12562159
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomimetics10100695
Abstract (original English)
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in regulating cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and drug resistance. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro models and animal models often fail to replicate the biochemical and biophysical complexity of human tumors, leading to low predictive power in preclinical drug screening. In recent years, scaffold-based three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models have emerged as promising alternatives, offering a more physiologically relevant context for studying tumor behavior. Among these, biomimetic scaffolds capable of replicating the composition, stiffness, porosity, and signaling features of the tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) are of particular interest. This review provides a comprehensive overview of scaffold-based approaches for mimicking the TME in vitro. After outlining the key characteristics of the tumor ECM, we discuss various scaffold typologies, including those based on natural, synthetic, and hybrid biomaterials, as well as decellularized ECM. Recent advancements in fabrication technologies, such as electrospinning and 3D bioprinting, are also highlighted for their role in replicating the geometric and mechanical features of tumor tissues. Special attention is given to the integration of vascular components and stromal cells to recapitulate the complexity of the TME. Finally, we explore current limitations and futur
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.