Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Senescence represses the nuclear localization of the serum response factor and differentiation regulates its nuclear localization with lineage specificity.

Ding W., Gao S., Scott RE.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in J Cell Sci (2001) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Cell Sci (2001)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
11181183
DOI
10.1242/jcs.114.5.1011

Abstract (original English)

The differentiation of cultured 3T3T mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes represses growth factor responsiveness by limiting the nuclear localization of the serum response factor (SRF) that binds to and activates the promoters of growth control genes that contain the serum response elements (SRE), such as junB and c-fos. The regulation of SRF nuclear localization by adipocyte differentiation is specific, because we show that adipocyte differentiation does not repress the nuclear localization of six other transacting factors. To determine if repression of growth factor responsiveness that occurs during senescence also represses the nuclear localization of SRF, we studied normal human WI-38 fibroblasts at low versus high population doublings. The results show that SRF localizes to the nucleus of proliferative cells whereas in senescent cells SRF can not be detected in the nucleus. This result is apparent in both immunofluorescence assays and in western blot analysis. We next evaluated the cellular distribution of SRF in selected human tissues to determine whether the loss of proliferative potential in vivo could have a different effect on SRF nuclear localization. We found that in cells of the small bowel mucosa, differentiation modulates SRF nuclear localization in an opposite manner. Minimal SRF expression and nuclear localization is evident in undifferentiated cells at the b

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageCell NucleusCellular SenescenceDNA-Binding ProteinsHumans

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research