Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Sex specific effects of irisin on the skeleton

Shimonty A., Bonewald LF.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Bone Res (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bone Res (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42270587
PMCID
PMC13254336
DOI
10.1038/s41413-026-00542-4

Abstract (original English)

Irisin, the circulating protein derived from cleavage of fibronectin type III domain containing protein 5 (FNDC5) has attracted considerable attention regarding its positive effects on a number of organs/tissues such as fat, brain, and heart. However, effects on bone can appear to be either positive or negative depending on context and sex. Sex differences have also been described in Alzheimer's disease also emphasizing sex differences in response to irisin. Here in this review, we outline and focus on the effects of irisin on osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes, murine models, and human studies. The consideration of sex effects is necessary especially in the context of irisin serving as a therapeutic.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Bone and BonesOsteoclastsOsteoblastsOsteocytesAnimalsHumansFibronectinsSex CharacteristicsFemaleMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research