Silk Fibroin Methacrylation: Chemical Synthesis to Biomechanical Optimization in Tissue Engineering
Wu CA., Zhu Y., Woo YJ.
Narrative Review, published in ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40344177
- PMCID
- PMC12152832
- DOI
- 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01931
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
In recent years, a major focus in the field of tissue engineering has been the search for a suitable biomaterial for clinical applications. Researchers have sought to optimize natural, synthetic, and hybrid options, with an aim to enhance biological, chemical, physical, and mechanical properties. In the past decade, silk fibroin has emerged as a promising approach due to its suitable properties. Specifically, the chemical modification of silk fibroin with methacrylate agents, namely glycidyl methacrylate, methacrylic anhydride, and gelatin methacryloyl, confers the material with improved biophysical properties. This review presents an in-depth overview of silk fibroin's structure and suitable properties, silk fibroin methacrylate synthesis and characterization techniques, and applications of silk fibroin in bone and cartilage, skin, and nerve tissue engineering. Challenges include a limited understanding of methacrylate agents on specific cell types, which can be addressed by further in vivo investigations utilizing biomaterial compounds to confer tissue-specific needs. We conclude with our perspective of the present limitations and future trends of the methacrylated SF platform.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.