Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

A simple and effective method for making multipotent/multilineage scaffolds with hydrophilic nature without any postmodification/treatment.

Vaikkath D., Anitha R., Sumathy B., Nair PD.

Animal Study, published in Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces (2015)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
26848946
DOI
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.041

Abstract (original English)

A number of biodegradable and bioresorbable materials, as well as scaffold designs, have been experimentally and/or clinically studied for tissue engineering of diverse tissue types. Cell-material responses are strongly dependent on the properties of the scaffold material. In this study, scaffolds based on polycaprolactone (PCL) and PCL blended with a triblock copolymer, Polycaprolactone-polytetrahydrofuran-polycaprolactone (PCL-PTHF-PCL) at different ratios were fabricated by electrospinning. Blending and electrospinning of the triblock copolymer with PCL generated a super hydrophilic scaffold, the mechanical and biological properties of which varied with the concentration of the triblock copolymer. The hydrophilicity of the electrospun scaffolds was determined by measurement of water-air contact angle. Cellular response to the electrospun scaffolds was studied by seeding two types of cells, L929 fibroblast cell line and rat mesenchymal stem cells (RMSC). We observed that the super hydrophilicity of the material did not prevent cell adhesion, while the cell proliferation was low or negligible for scaffolds containing higher amount of PCL-PTHF-PCL. Chondrogenic differentiation of RMSC was found to be better on the PCL blend containing 10% (w/v) of PCL-PTHF-PCL than the bare PCL. Our studies indicate that the cellular response is dependent on the biomaterial composition and high

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsButylene GlycolsCell DifferentiationCell LineCell LineageCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChondrogenesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.