Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A simple modification of the separation method reduces heterogeneity of adipose-derived stem cells.

Griesche N., Luttmann W., Luttmann A., Stammermann T., Geiger H., Baer PC.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Cells Tissues Organs (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Cells Tissues Organs (2010)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
20185896
DOI
10.1159/000289586
Citations
36

Abstract (original English)

High hopes are put into the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in various approaches for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. MSCs are derived from different tissues with only small differences in their phenotype or their differentiation potential, but higher differences in the cell yield. Since fat is easily accessible and contains a high amount of MSCs to be isolated, adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) are very promising for clinical approaches. ASCs are not a completely homogeneous cell population. Our study was initiated to explore an easy and convenient method to reduce heterogeneity. We tested different isolation methods: (1) the standard isolation method for ASCs based on plastic attachment, (2) the standard method with an initial washing step after 60 min of adherence and (3) immunomagnetic isolation by 4 typical markers (CD49a, CD90, CD105 and CD271). Cells isolated by these methods were evaluated using quantitative PCR and flow cytometry as well as by their differentiation potential. Washing led to a significantly lower expression of desmin, smA and six2, and a higher expression of the stem cell markers nestin, oct-4 and sall-1, compared to standard isolated cells, while the immunomagnetically isolated cells showed no significant changes. All cells independent of the isolation method could be induced to differentiate into adipocytes and osteoblasts. Our stud

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdultAntigens, CDCell DifferentiationCell SeparationEndoglinFemaleHumansIntegrin alpha1Magnetics

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research