Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Sources of processed lipoaspirate cells: influence of donor site on cell concentration.

Padoin AV., Braga-Silva J., Martins P., Rezende K., Rezende ARDR., Grechi B.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 25 on Knee, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2008)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
25
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18626381
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d5476
Citations
93

Abstract (original English)

Background Recently, adipose tissue harvested by liposuction has been identified as a source of processed lipoaspirate cells. The aim of this study was to determine the concentration of processed lipoaspirate cells in adipose tissue obtained by liposuction from different harvest areas in women. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 25 women in whom liposuction in four or more different zones in the same procedure was indicated. After selective liposuction, the material was sent to the laboratory, where it was processed for extraction of processed lipoaspirate cells, which were separated from the adipose tissue, quantified, and characterized through determination of c-kit expression. The following harvest regions were evaluated: upper abdomen, lower abdomen, trochanteric region, inner thigh, knee, and flank. The cell concentration obtained at each site was compared by analysis of variance for mixed models. Results A significant difference was found for cell concentration obtained at the different harvest sites. The cell concentration in the lower abdomen was greater than in other areas, but no significant difference was found in relation to the inner thigh. Conclusions The lower abdomen and the inner thigh may have higher processed lipoaspirate cell concentrations. These sites may turn out to be better sources of adult mesenchymal stem cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdultBody Mass IndexCell CountCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLipectomyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationProspective Studies

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research