Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Spinal fusion using adipose stem cells seeded on a radiolucent cage filler: a feasibility study of a single surgical procedure in goats.

Kroeze RJ., Smit TH., Vergroesen PP., Bank RA., Stoop R., van Rietbergen B.

Animal Study on Back & Spine, published in Eur Spine J (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Eur Spine J (2014)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
25421549
DOI
10.1007/s00586-014-3696-x
Citations
18

Abstract (original English)

Purpose To assess the feasibility of a one-step surgical concept, employing adipose stem cells (ASCs) and a novel degradable radiolucent cage filler (poly-L-lactide-co-caprolactone; PLCL), within polyetheretherketone cages in a stand-alone caprine spinal fusion model. Methods A double-level fusion study was performed in 36 goats. Four cage filler groups were defined: (i) acellular PLCL, (ii) PLCL + SVF (freshly harvested stromal vascular fraction highly enriched in ASCs); (iii) PLCL + ASCs (cultured to homogeneity); and (iv) autologous iliac crest bone graft (ABG). Fusion was assessed after 3 and 6 months by radiography, micro-CT, biomechanics, and biochemical analysis of tissue formed inside the cage after 6 months. Results No adverse effects were observed in all groups. After 3 months, similar and low fusion rates were found. Segmental stability did not differ between groups in all tested directions. Micro-CT imaging revealed significantly higher amounts of mineralized tissue in the ABG group compared to all others. After 6 months, interbody fusion rates were: PLCL 53%, SVF 30%, ASC 43% and ABG 63%. A trend towards higher mineralized tissue content was found for the ABG group. Biochemical and biomechanical analyses revealed equal maturity of collagen cross-links and similar segmental stability between all groups. Conclusions This study demonstrates the technical feasibility a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Absorbable ImplantsAdipose TissueAnimalsFeasibility StudiesGoatsIliumLumbar VertebraeModels, AnimalOsseointegrationPolyesters

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research