Standardization to Characterize the Complexity of Vessel Network Using the Aortic Ring Model
Wolint P., Hofmann S., von Atzigen J., Böni R., Miescher I., Giovanoli P.
Animal Study, published in Int J Mol Sci (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Int J Mol Sci (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39796147
- PMCID
- PMC11719671
- DOI
- 10.3390/ijms26010291
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Regeneration after ischemia requires to be promoted by (re)perfusion of the affected tissue, and, to date, there is no therapy that covers all needs. In treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), the secretome acts via paracrine mechanisms and has a positive influence on vascular regeneration via proangiogenic factors. A lack of standardization and the high complexity of vascular structures make it difficult to compare angiogenic readouts from different studies. This emphasizes the need for improved approaches and the introduction of an index in the preclinical setting. A characterization of human MSC secretomes obtained from one of the three formats-single cells, small, and large spheroids-was performed using the chicken aortic ring assay in combination with a modified angiogenic activity index (AAI) and an angiogenic profile. While the secretome of the small spheroid group showed an inhibitory effect on angiogenesis, the large spheroid group impressed with a fully pro-angiogenic response, and a higher AAI compared to the single cell group, underlying the suitability of these three-stem cell-derived secretomes with their distinct angiogenic properties to validate the AAI and the novel angiogenic profile established here.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.