The state of cell and gene therapy in 2023
Chancellor D., Barrett D., Nguyen-Jatkoe L., Millington S., Eckhardt F.
Clinical Trial, published in Mol Ther (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Mol Ther (2023)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 37927037
- PMCID
- PMC10727993
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.11.001
- Citations
- 96
Abstract (original English)
Progress in the understanding of human diseases has coincided with the advent of precision medicine, whereby the underlying genetic and molecular contributors can be used as diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. To address these, drug developers have designed a range of different treatment strategies, including gene therapy, which the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy defines as the use of genetic material to treat or prevent disease. A number of approaches exist, including the delivery of genetic material in vivo or ex vivo, as well as the use of RNA species to alter gene expression in particular disease states. Through the end of the first quarter of 2023, there were more than 100 different approved gene, cell, and RNA therapies throughout the world, with over 3,700 more in clinical and preclinical development. This review comprehensively captures the landscape for such advanced therapies, including the different genetic technologies used and diseases targeted in clinical trials.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.