State of the Nonunion: A review of the latest literature
Ghanem W., Ezzeddine H., Saad R., Kiwan E., Dahdouh R., Fakih O.
Laboratory Study, published in Orthop Rev (Pavia) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Orthop Rev (Pavia) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39925644
- PMCID
- PMC11807701
- DOI
- 10.52965/001c.129085
- Citations
- 13
Abstract (original English)
The distinction between prolonged bone healing and nonunion in long bone fracture remains a historical challenge in the field of orthopedics. Despite numerous proposed definitions and scoring systems, a consensus remains elusive, thereby complicating both diagnosis and treatment. An accurate diagnosis is necessary, facilitated by a range of imaging modalities. Bone nonunion management encompasses surgical and non-surgical options, including external or internal fixation, and bone grafting, tailored to the nonunion type. This review discusses the pathophysiology of nonunion, risk factors, diagnosis and treatment. It particularly addresses early detection and the impacts of nonunion on the patient. The aim of this review is to obtain a global and updated point of view regarding nonunion of the bone as well as to reflect on the potential use of untraditional methods in their treatment such as orthobiologics, along with emerging and non-invasive technologies including shockwave therapy, gene therapy, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and 3D printing.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.