Stem cell applications in regenerative medicine for stress urinary incontinence: A review of effectiveness based on clinical trials.
Barakat B., Franke K., Schakaki S., Hijazi S., Hasselhof V., Vögeli TA.
Clinical Trial, published in Arab J Urol (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Arab J Urol (2020)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 33029431
- PMCID
- PMC7473152
- DOI
- 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1750864
- Citations
- 20
Abstract (original English)
Objective To evaluate the current state, therapeutic benefit and safety of urethral injection of autologous stem cells for the treatment stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Materials and methods A selective database search of PubMed, the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar was conducted to validate the effectiveness of stem cell-based therapy. The search included clinical trials published up until 4 January 2020, written in English, and included cohorts of women and men who had received stem cell-based therapy for SUI. The search used the following keywords in various combinations: 'stem cell therapy', 'cell-based therapy for SUI', 'regenerative medicine for SUI', and 'tissue engineering'. The success rates were assessed according to cough test, urodynamics, pad tests, and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. The primary endpoint was continence rate to measure objectively the effect of the treatment. Results We identified four clinical trials using local injections of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), 11 trails with muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs), and two trails with human umbilical cord blood stem cells (HUCBs) and total nucleated cells (TNCs). The median improvement rate of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after ADSCs, MDSCs, TNCs, HUCBs injections were 88%, 77%, 89%, 36% (improvement rate: 1-2 pad
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.