Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Stem-cell regenerative medicine as applied to the penis.

Pozzi E., Muneer A., Sangster P., Alnajjar HM., Salonia A., Bettocchi C.

Clinical Trial, published in Curr Opin Urol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Curr Opin Urol (2019)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31008782
DOI
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000636
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Purpose of review Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine has emerged as a new scientific interdisciplinary field focusing on developing new strategies to repair or recreate tissues and organs. This review gathers findings on erectile dysfunction and, Peyronie's disease from recent preclinical and clinical studies under heading of stem-cell regenerative medicine. Recent findings Over the last 2 years, preclinical studies on rat models demonstrated the tangible beneficial role of stem cells and stromal vascular fraction in the context of preventing fibrosis and restoring erectile function in different animal models of Erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease. There are not solid evidences in the clinical settings. Summary Large randomized, double blind clinical trials are needed to prove the efficacy of stem-cell therapy on human patients. Owing to the lack of solid evidences, the stem-cell therapy should be only administrated in a clinical research setting.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsDouble-Blind MethodHumansMalePenile DiseasesPenisRatsRegenerative MedicineStem Cell TransplantationTissue Engineering

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.