Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMedOpen access

Stem cell therapies for biological repair in osteonecrosis: advances, challenges, and clinical insights.

Cheng D., Ou X., Long J., Zheng C., Shi S.

Clinical Trial on Cartilage Damage, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Front Med (Lausanne) (2026)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
42338943
PMCID
PMC13283841
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1772819

Abstract (original English)

Osteonecrosis is a bone condition that begins as an ischemic process and can progress to subchondral collapse and premature joint degeneration in untreated cases. Conventional treatments offer physical or symptomatic relief but do not address the underlying physiological deficiencies. Regenerative therapeutic techniques based on stem cells have been developed to stimulate osteogenesis, vascular therapeutic, and immunomodulation in bone defects. Existing clinical applications are based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and adipose tissue, as well as engineered and pluripotent-derived constructs that are also in preclinical development. Preliminary clinical trials have indicated that stem cell therapy (SCT) can enhance symptoms and slow the progression of structural defects. However, inconsistent cell quality, non-standardized protocols, regulatory obstacles, and limited long-term outcomes are the key limitations. This review summarizes the available evidence, issues, and future trends in optimizing stem cell therapies for osteonecrosis.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research