Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Stem Cell Therapies for Reversing Vision Loss.

Higuchi A., Kumar SS., Benelli G., Alarfaj AA., Munusamy MA., Umezawa A.

Clinical Trial, published in Trends Biotechnol (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Trends Biotechnol (2017)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28751147
DOI
10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.016
Citations
45

Abstract (original English)

Current clinical trials that evaluate human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based therapies predominantly target treating macular degeneration of the eyes because the eye is an isolated tissue that is naturally weakly immunogenic. Here, we discuss current bioengineering approaches and biomaterial usage in combination with stem cell therapy for macular degeneration disease treatment. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) differentiated from hPSCs is typically used in most clinical trials for treating patients, whereas bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMNCs) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are intravitreally transplanted, undifferentiated, into patient eyes. We also discuss reported negative effects of stem cell therapy, such as patients becoming blind following transplantation of adipose-derived stem cells, which are increasingly used by 'stem-cell clinics'.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBlindnessCell DifferentiationHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsRetinal Pigment Epithelium

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.