Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Stem cell transplantation in living donor renal transplantation for minimization of immunosuppression.

Vanikar AV., Trivedi HL.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 392 on Systemic / IV, published in Transplantation (2012) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Transplantation (2012)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
392
Source database
PubMed
PMID
22992765
DOI
10.1097/TP.0b013e3182664000

Abstract (original English)

We present our experience of living-donor renal transplantation (LDRT) using pretransplant stem cell transplantation (SCT) where we have successfully achieved minimization of immunosuppression. Nine hundred sixteen patients underwent LDRT between 2007 and 2011: 606 under tolerance induction protocol (TIP) and 310 with our usual triple immunosuppression of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), mycofenolate sodium (MMF), and prednisone (controls). The test group (TIP) was stratified into group 1, 1 haplomatch or greater (n=392), group 3, less than 1 haplomatch (n=214); controls were similarly stratified to group 2, 1 haplomatch or greater (n=179) and group 4, less than 1 haplomatch (n=131). The TIP consisted of donor-specific transfusion, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and nonmyeloablative conditioning with total lymphoid irradiation, cyclophosphamide, and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin. Posttransplant IS consisted of prednisone, CNI, or MMF, all in low doses. Four-year patient survival was 93.5%, 90.7%, 88.7%, and 82.7% in groups 1 through 4, respectively, and death-censored 4-year allograft survival was 94.8%, 95.4%, 94.5%, and 74.6%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine (mg/dL) for groups 1 through 4, respectively, at 4 years was 1.26, 1.57, 1.29, and 2.1. The number of rejection episodes was highest in group 4 and lowest in group 1. Mini

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdultFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmune ToleranceKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsLymphatic Irradiation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research