Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Stem cells from adipose tissue allow challenging new concepts for regenerative medicine.

Helder MN., Knippenberg M., Klein-Nulend J., Wuisman PI.

Narrative Review on Back & Spine, published in Tissue Eng (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Tissue Eng (2007)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17518736
DOI
10.1089/ten.2006.0165

Abstract (original English)

The perspective of an innovative new concept integrating tissue-engineering techniques with an established surgical technique is described. The focus is primarily on a one-step surgical procedure using adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, a calcium phosphate scaffold as a carrier, and a bioresorbable polymer cage to facilitate spinal interbody fusion. We address the harvesting and processing of clinically relevant quantities of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, triggering of these stem cells toward lineage-specific differentiation, seeding of the triggered stem cells on a bioresorbable scaffold, and implantation of the resulting tissue-engineered construct. The integrated steps can be accomplished within one surgical procedure in a surgical theater. Although the proposed concept has been developed for spinal fusion, potential application in other surgical disciplines is presumed realistic.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsHumansRegenerationRegenerative MedicineStem CellsTissue Engineering

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research