Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Currently Registered Clinical Trials.

Abraham M., Shalom M., Gold J., Seaton M., Maleski Smith A., Gendreau J.

Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 20 on Spinal Cord Injury, published in World Neurosurg (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
World Neurosurg (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
20
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39159672
DOI
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.074

Abstract (original English)

Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects around 18,000 individuals annually, representing nearly one-third of all paralysis cases. Stem cell therapy, a focal point in contemporary neuroregeneration research for SCI treatment, holds potential in leveraging undifferentiated stem cells to regenerate damaged tissues. This study seeks to comprehensively analyze current clinical trials exploring the potential use of stem cells in treating spinal cord injuries. A data retrieval approach examined the ClinicalTrials.gov database using the terms "spinal cord injury" and "stem cells." Exclusion criteria eliminated studies not recruiting, terminated prematurely, suspended, withdrawn, or of unknown status. Data for each trial, including ClinicalTrial.gov NCT identifier, title, intervention details, initiation/completion dates, and sample size, were systematically collected. Literature searches on PubMed.gov were conducted for completed trials with results. Thirty clinical trials were analyzed, with 20 completed and six with published results on PubMed.gov. Interventions included 20 biological (66.7%), 6 procedural (20%), and 4 drug interventions (13.3%). Stem cell sources varied, including bone marrow (46.7%), umbilical cells (20%), adipose tissue (20%), embryonic cells (6.7%), and neural cells (6.7%). Trials spanned 2005 to 2022, with 11 (36.7%) commencing in or after 2017. Among six trials with r

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Spinal Cord InjuriesHumansClinical Trials as TopicStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research