Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Currently Registered Clinical Trials.
Abraham M., Shalom M., Gold J., Seaton M., Maleski Smith A., Gendreau J.
Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 20 on Spinal Cord Injury, published in World Neurosurg (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- World Neurosurg (2024)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- 20
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 39159672
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.074
Abstract (original English)
Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects around 18,000 individuals annually, representing nearly one-third of all paralysis cases. Stem cell therapy, a focal point in contemporary neuroregeneration research for SCI treatment, holds potential in leveraging undifferentiated stem cells to regenerate damaged tissues. This study seeks to comprehensively analyze current clinical trials exploring the potential use of stem cells in treating spinal cord injuries. A data retrieval approach examined the ClinicalTrials.gov database using the terms "spinal cord injury" and "stem cells." Exclusion criteria eliminated studies not recruiting, terminated prematurely, suspended, withdrawn, or of unknown status. Data for each trial, including ClinicalTrial.gov NCT identifier, title, intervention details, initiation/completion dates, and sample size, were systematically collected. Literature searches on PubMed.gov were conducted for completed trials with results. Thirty clinical trials were analyzed, with 20 completed and six with published results on PubMed.gov. Interventions included 20 biological (66.7%), 6 procedural (20%), and 4 drug interventions (13.3%). Stem cell sources varied, including bone marrow (46.7%), umbilical cells (20%), adipose tissue (20%), embryonic cells (6.7%), and neural cells (6.7%). Trials spanned 2005 to 2022, with 11 (36.7%) commencing in or after 2017. Among six trials with r
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as biomarker in stem cell-based therapies of preclinical spinal cord injury models: A systematic review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Tissue Cell (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Tissue Cell3 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Revolutionizing neural regeneration with smart responsive materials: Current insights and future prospects
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Bioact Mater5 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 42 on Diabetic Foot, Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 42
Adv Sci (Weinh)18 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurosci