Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Stem and progenitor cell therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension: effects on the right ventricle (2013 Grover Conference Series)

van der Laarse A., Cobbaert CM., Umar S.

Narrative Review on Chronic Inflammation, published in Pulm Circ (2015) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Pulm Circ (2015)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
25992272
PMCID
PMC4405720
DOI
10.1086/679701
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

In experimental animals and in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a wide spectrum of structural and functional conditions is known that may be responsible for the switch of a state of "compensated" right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy to a state of RV failure. In recent years, therapy with differentiated cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to cause partial or complete reversal of pathological characteristics of PAH. The therapeutic effects of stem or progenitor cell therapy are considered to be (1) paracrine effects from stem or progenitor cells that had engrafted in the myocardium (or elsewhere), by compounds that have anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic, and proangiogenic actions and (2) unloading effects on the right ventricle due to stem or progenitor cell-induced decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and decrease in pulmonary artery pressure.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research