Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Stimulation of calvarial bone healing with human bone marrow stromal cells versus inhibition with adipose-tissue stromal cells on nanostructured β-TCP-collagen.

Bothe F., Lotz B., Seebach E., Fischer J., Hesse E., Diederichs S.

Animal Study, published in Acta Biomater (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Acta Biomater (2018)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29933108
DOI
10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.026

Abstract (original English)

Bioactive functional scaffolds are essential for support of cell-based strategies to improve bone regeneration. Adipose-tissue-derived-stromal cells (ASC) are more accessible multipotent cells with faster proliferation than bone-marrow-derived-stromal-cells (BMSC) having potential to replace BMSC for therapeutic stimulation of bone-defect healing. Their osteogenic potential is, however, lower compared to BMSC, a deficit that may be overcome in growth factor-rich orthotopic bone defects with enhanced bone-conductive scaffolds. Objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic potency of human ASC and BMSC for bone regeneration on a novel nanoparticulate β-TCP/collagen-carrier (β-TNC). Cytotoxicity of β-TCP nanoparticles and multilineage differentiation of cells were characterized in vitro. Cell-seeded β-TNC versus cell-free controls were implanted into 4 mm calvarial bone-defects in immunodeficient mice and bone healing was quantified by µCT at 4 and 8 weeks. Tissue-quality and cell-origin were assessed by histology. β-TNC was non-toxic, radiolucent and biocompatible, lent excellent support for human cell persistence and allowed formation of human bone tissue by BMSC but not ASC. Opposite to BMSC, ASC-grafting significantly inhibited calvarial bone healing compared to controls. Bone formation progressed significantly from 4 to 8 weeks only in BMSC and controls yielding 5.6-

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCalcium PhosphatesFemaleFracture HealingHumansMiceMice, SCIDNanoparticles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.