Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Stimuli-responsive hybrid materials for 4D <i>in vitro</i> tissue models

Aizarna-Lopetegui U., Bittinger SC., Álvarez N., Henriksen-Lacey M., Jimenez de Aberasturi D.

Narrative Review, published in Mater Today Bio (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mater Today Bio (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40688677
PMCID
PMC12275134
DOI
10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102035
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

There is an existing need to develop 3D tissue models which correctly recapitulate healthy and diseased states. The most commonly used techniques focus on simplistic 2D cell culture techniques, themselves incapable of transmitting the complexity of multi-tissue arrangements, and archaic and unnecessary animal models which fail to reproduce species-dependent aspects. The advances in materials science and engineering approaches have opened the possibility to realistically design and even print, in 3D, complex tissue arrangements, aiming to reach full-scale organ printing. Significant improvements have been noted on the spatial and temporal scale, with excellent resolution and overall size being achieved, in addition to models with extensive lifespans. The application of 3D printing to achieve such models has been extensively reviewed. However, there remains an important lack of integration of physical and mechanical cues to achieve tissue responsiveness, aimed to mimic physiological conditions that occur frequently. With this in mind, we have conducted an extensive review of the literature related to stimuli-responsive materials compatible with 3D (bio)printing techniques. Such materials, often termed hybrid materials due to the combination of organic matrices with inorganic actuators, provide "life" to materials, thus adding an extra dimension to the printing technique and coini

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.