Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Strong living scaffolds for load-bearing musculoskeletal tissue regeneration

Chen N., Wu M., Williams R., Yan J., Zhou J., Zhu D.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, published in Mater Today Bio (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mater Today Bio (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41362457
PMCID
PMC12681846
DOI
10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102571
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Load-bearing musculoskeletal tissues, including bone, cartilage, tendon, ligament, and skeletal muscle, possess highly specialized biological and biomechanical properties that enable weight support, movement, and protection of vital organs. However, intrinsic limitations in self-healing and exposure to complex physiological forces render them particularly vulnerable to injury and degeneration, resulting in musculoskeletal disorders with significant global impact. Current clinical solutions, ranging from bioinert metallic or polymeric implants to bioinductive, biodegradable scaffolds, provide temporary mechanical stabilization or promote tissue remodeling, yet often fail to achieve simultaneous mechanical robustness and biological functionality. To overcome these limitations, regenerative scaffolds incorporating living cells have emerged as a new paradigm. Nevertheless, conventional cell-laden hydrogels suffer from inadequate load-bearing capacity, whereas polymer scaffolds, although mechanically robust, lack the biological microenvironment to support functional regeneration. Recent research has therefore focused on developing strong living scaffolds that integrate toughness and cytocompatibility through two main approaches: mechanical reinforcement of cell-laden hydrogels and design of polymer-hydrogel hybrid scaffolds. This review summarizes the biology and biomechanics of loa

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research