Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Study on the Impact of Pea Protein on the Printability and Storage Quality of the 3D Printing Pork Jerky

Wu L., Wang A., Cui Q.

Laboratory Study, published in Foods (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Foods (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41227671
PMCID
PMC12608621
DOI
10.3390/foods14213701

Abstract (original English)

Food 3D printing technology for meat products has garnered significant attention. However, natural meat often requires the modification of its relevant properties to meet the processing demands of 3D printing. This study utilized minced pork as the primary raw material and employed pea protein to enhance both the 3D printability and storage quality characteristics of the pork paste. The results indicated that the optimal printing performance was achieved with a pea protein addition level of 20% (pork-to-pea protein mass ratios of 5:1). Specifically, pea protein significantly improved the material properties critical for 3D printing, enhancing the gel strength rising from 93.31 to 241.52 g and stability of the printing material. The 3D-printed pork products were stored at 25, 35, and 45 °C for 44 days, with increasing storage temperature, the moisture content, water activity, pH, and freshness of the 3D-printed meat products significantly decreased ( p < 0.05), after 30 days of storage at 45 °C, the acid value reached 4.13 mg/g. During storage, a total of 233 volatile flavor compounds were identified, which comprised 17 esters, 26 alcohols, 58 terpenes, 69 alkanes, 20 aldehydes, 29 heterocyclic compounds, and 14 other compounds (including acids, ketones, and ethers), among 19 key flavor compounds, nonanal, phenethylaldehyde, D-limonene, zingiberene, and α-curcumene contributed s

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.