Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMedOpen access

Subject-Reported Satisfaction After Cell-Enriched Lipotransfer (CELT) for Lip Augmentation.

Diesch S., Frank K., Brébant V., Bohusch S., Brix E., Zeng R.

Retrospective Study on Face & Skin, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Aesthetic Plast Surg (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40389732
PMCID
PMC12513944
DOI
10.1007/s00266-025-04875-z
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Lip augmentation is a highly demanded cosmetic procedure due to the association of full lips with youth, beauty, and sensuality. Among various techniques, autologous fat grafting, particularly with the cell-enriched lipotransfer (CELT) method, has emerged as a natural and long-lasting option. Unlike hyaluronic acid fillers, which require regular touch-ups, CELT offers sustained volume retention and potentially higher patient satisfaction. This study aimed to assess patient satisfaction following lip augmentation using the CELT technique and compare it with traditional fat preparation methods, such as sedimentation and filtration. The study also sought to evaluate the influence of other variables, including gender, age, and fat injection volume, on satisfaction outcomes. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent lip augmentation with autologous fat grafting was conducted. Satisfaction was measured using the FACE-Q TM questionnaire, focusing on various lip-related aspects such as shape, fullness, and how well the lips suited the face. The study compared satisfaction outcomes between the CELT method and combined sedimentation/filtration techniques. Statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Pearson's correlation was performed to assess the influence of preparation method, injected volume, and patient demographics. The CELT method consistently produced high

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansFemaleRetrospective StudiesPatient SatisfactionMaleAdultLipMiddle AgedAdipose TissueEsthetics

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research