Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesEurope PMCOpen access

Sudden Loss of Vision Following Cosmetic Autologous Fat Transfer

Alsafi Z., Tendo C., Jarrar Z., Richardson T., Zakir R.

Case Report / Series on Face & Skin, published in Cureus (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
Cureus (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41080240
PMCID
PMC12514458
DOI
10.7759/cureus.92029

Abstract (original English)

Cosmetic tourism and facial aesthetic procedures are increasing in popularity worldwide, with patients often seeking low-cost interventions abroad. Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is commonly performed for periorbital rejuvenation and carries a risk of rare but severe ophthalmic complications. We describe a case of unilateral visual loss following periorbital AFT, in which the underlying mechanism was scleral penetration leading to vitreous haemorrhage, retinal incarceration, and extraocular muscle entrapment. Surgical management with pars plana vitrectomy restored partial vision, although motility restriction persisted. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of retinal incarceration caused by cosmetic AFT. This case highlights the need for careful technique, thorough patient counselling, and vigilant post-operative follow-up in cosmetic tourism.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research