Supercharged Mechanical Stromal-cell Transfer (MEST)
Copcu HE.
Laboratory Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33996346
- PMCID
- PMC8116016
- DOI
- 10.1097/gox.0000000000003552
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
PRP and fat-derived stromal-cell applications are the 2 most commonly used methods in regenerative medicine. PRP has a wide spectrum of indications. Mechanical methods have become very popular recently in fat-derived stromal-cell applications due to the advantages they provide. Combining these 2 methods has produced more successful results. To date, this combination has been in the form of combining 2 products obtained separately just before they are administered to the patient. In this study, fat tissue and blood samples obtained from eight volunteers were mixed with PPP as a new idea not previously reported in the literature, and stromal cells were obtained mechanically with sharp blades (adinizing). Later, the obtained PRP was added to the final product and became "supercharged." The results were tested by the dual fluoroscopy method for cell number and viability, and the results obtained were analyzed statistically. By adding the plasma to the oil before stromal cells were obtained and cutting with sharp blades by mechanical separation, twice the volume and 4.7 times more cells were obtained compared with that obtained in the saline group ( P < 0.001). We believe that the reason for this is the "binding" effect of the proteins in the plasma. This approach provided a higher cell count by using PPP, which is a "waste product," and in addition, the potential efficiency was inc
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.