Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Surgical Outcomes in Non-Transected and Partially Transected Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Sakthiyendran NA., Morris K., Cushman CJ., Hernandez EJ., Idicula A., MacKay BJ.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Brain Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Brain Sci (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41300211
PMCID
PMC12651499
DOI
10.3390/brainsci15111202

Abstract (original English)

Background Non-transected and partially transected peripheral nerve injuries (neuromas-in-continuity) are relatively common but understudied. Their optimal surgical management and expected outcomes remain unclear. We conducted a literature review of surgical repairs in such lesions and illustrate a case to guide decision-making. Systematic searches of PubMed and Google Scholar identified 70 eligible reports (Level I = 2, Level II = 5, Level III = 37, Level IV = 20, Level V = 4). Across studies, neurolysis of NAP-positive lesions often restored antigravity strength, while direct repair or grafting of nonconductive segments yielded meaningful recovery in ~75%. After neurolysis or reconstruction, ~77-92% of brachial plexus/axillary neuromas-in-continuity reached LSUHSC Grade ≥3. Median/ulnar lesions treated with neurolysis, biologic/vascularized coverage, or reconstruction showed reliable pain relief but variable sensory/motor recovery. Radial/PIN lesions improved in some series irrespective of NAPs. Earlier intervention, shorter gaps, distal sites, and younger age correlated with superior outcomes. Meanwhile, prolonged observation risking end-organ atrophy degraded results. Adjuncts such as electrical stimulation and wraps may aid reinnervation or reduce scarring, though high-quality evidence is limited. Conclusions For non-transected and partially transected PNIs, a pragmatic ap

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research