Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Synergistic Effects of Thread Lifting, Autologous Fat Grafting, and Multi-Modal Laser Therapy in Facial Rejuvenation

Celik N.

Retrospective Study on Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthet Surg J Open Forum (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41322037
PMCID
PMC12662049
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojaf139

Abstract (original English)

Background Facial aging is a multifactorial process involving tissue descent, volume depletion, and dermal degeneration. Minimally invasive modalities like thread lifting, autologous fat grafting, and laser treatments address different aging components. However, their synergistic impact remains underexplored. Objectives The aim of the author of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy and histologic rationale of combining permanent thread lifting, autologous fat grafting, and nonablative laser therapy for comprehensive facial rejuvenation. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 65 female patients (aged 31-60, Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV) treated from January 2022 to January 2023 were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: thread lifting alone (Group 1), thread + laser (Group 2), and thread + laser + fat grafting (Group 3). Evaluations were performed at 12 months by a plastic surgeon, a dermatologist, and the patients themselves using a 5-point Likert-scale assessing skin texture, fine wrinkles, lift effect, and overall satisfaction. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction were utilized, alongside cumulative link regression models. Results Significant group differences were observed in skin texture ( P = .00013) and overall satisfaction ( P = .00421). Post hoc comparisons revealed that Groups 2 and 3 outperformed Group 1 in skin

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research