A Systematic Review on Artificial Liver for Implantation

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Chronic liver disease remains a leading cause of global mortality, yet organ shortages and transplant complications limit the efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation. While extracorporeal support systems serve as temporary bridges, they fail to restore long-term patient autonomy or replicate complex biosynthetic functions. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluates recent advancements in implantable artificial livers (IALs) designed for permanent functional integration. We analyzed 71 eligible studies, assessing cellular sources, fabrication strategies, maturation processes, and functional readiness. Our findings indicate significant progress in stem-cell-derived hepatocytes and bioactive scaffolds, such as decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM). However, a critical technological gap remains in scaling current sub-centimeter prototypes toward clinically relevant volumes (~200 mL). Key engineering challenges include integrating hierarchical vascular networks, requiring primary vessels exceeding 2 mm in diameter for surgical anastomosis, and functional biliary systems to prevent cholestatic injury. Furthermore, while micro-vascularization and protein synthesis are well documented, higher-order functions such as spatial zonation and coordinated metabolic stability remain underreported. Future clinical translation necessitates ad

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.