T-cell mesenchymal transition represents a potential pathogenic mechanism of female cancer-related lymphedema.
Wang L., Chen J., Wei M., Liu Z., Zhou Y., Chen Y.
Prospective Study, published in Nat Commun (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Nat Commun (2026)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 42010242
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-026-72023-5
Abstract (original English)
Cancer-related lymphedema (CRL), the most common type of secondary lymphedema, seriously reduces the life quality of cancer patients. In-depth studies on the pathogenesis of CRL are limited, impeding the development of therapeutic approaches. In this study, an analysis of intercellular heterogeneity reveals a trend towards fibrosis in skin cell subpopulations and identifies the phenomenon of T-cell mesenchymal transition (TcMT). T cells with a mesenchymal phenotype-fibroblast-like (Fib-like) T cells and myofibroblast-like (Myofibro-like) T cells-exhibit a unique fibrotic phenotype and impaired immune function. Furthermore, PDGFRB expression by Fib-like T cells in the affected skin is likely to influence disease severity by regulating TcMT. Additionally, we observe the manifestation of the fibrotic phenotype of T cells in single-cell data from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of CRL patients, suggesting that TcMT may be a pathological feature and potential therapeutic target of CRL and providing deep insights into disease pathophysiology.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.