Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) on Alzheimer's Disease: Review of Clinical Results.

Kim AL., Lee WK., Kwon S., Han I., Choi BH.

Clinical Trial on Neuroinflammation, published in Tissue Eng Regen Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Tissue Eng Regen Med (2026)
Country
Korea (South)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41533329
DOI
10.1007/s13770-025-00782-1
NCT
NCT04684602

Abstract (original English)

Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents significant unmet medical needs with no effective therapeutic options. Current pharmacological treatments provide only symptomatic relief and do not prevent the ongoing neurodegeneration. Cell therapies using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are being widely investigated for its potential in treating AD but remain unverified. This review aimed to evaluate therapeutic effects of MSCs on AD patients through a review of clinical trial literatures. Publications and registered clinical trials from January 2011 to June 2025 were collected from the international databases (ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS) using the keywords of "Alzheimer's disease", "mesenchymal stem cells", and "clinical trials". After initial screening and sorting, 17 clinical trials and 4 related papers were finally selected for in-depth analysis. The 17 clinical trials were mostly early stages with 4 phase 1 (23.5%), 9 phases 1/2 (52.9%), 3 phase 2 (17.7%), and 1 pilot phase (5.9%). The source of MSCs included allogeneic umbilical cord blood (UCB) in 5 trials (29.4%), autologous adipose tissue in 4 (23.5%), allogeneic umbilical cord (UC) in 3 (17.6%), allogeneic bone marrow (BM) in 3 (17.6%), allogeneic placenta in 1 (5.9%) and 1 unknown (5.9%). Administration routes were primarily intravenous (IV) infusion in 12 trials (70.6%), intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusi

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansAlzheimer DiseaseMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsClinical Trials as TopicAnimalsTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research