The therapeutic potential of the mesenchymal stem cell secretome in ischaemic stroke
Cunningham CJ., Redondo-Castro E., Allan SM.
Narrative Review on Stroke Research, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2018)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 29768965
- PMCID
- PMC6077926
- DOI
- 10.1177/0271678x18776802
- Citations
- 180
Abstract (original English)
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great potential as a regenerative therapy for stroke, leading to increased repair and functional recovery in animal models of cerebral ischaemia. While it was initially hypothesised that cell replacement was an important mechanism of action of MSCs, focus has shifted to their paracrine actions or the so called "bystander" effect. MSCs secrete a wide array of growth factors, chemokines, cytokines and extracellular vesicles, commonly referred to as the MSC secretome. There is evidence suggesting the MSC secretome can promote repair through a number of mechanisms including preventing cell apoptosis, modulating the inflammatory response and promoting endogenous repair mechanisms such as angiogenesis and neurogenesis. In this review, we will discuss the in vitro approaches currently being employed to drive the MSC secretome towards a more anti-inflammatory and regenerative phenotype. We will then examine the role of the secretome in promoting repair and improving recovery in preclinical models of cerebral ischaemia.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke: neuroimaging approaches and evidence from a systematic review
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in Front Neurol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Neurol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 3345 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Syst Rev (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3345
Syst Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Safety and Efficacy of Transendocardial Stem Cells Therapy in Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Meta-analysis on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Curr Cardiol Rev (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Curr Cardiol Rev - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke in Animal Models: A Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Stroke Research, published in CNS Neurosci Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
CNS Neurosci Ther5 citations - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
The inconclusive superiority debate of allogeneic versus autologous MSCs in treating patients with HFrEF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 1184 on Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 1184
Stem Cell Res Ther2 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
In vitro and In vivo Studies on Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Ischemic Stroke Therapy: A Scoping Review of The Therapeutic Effect
Systematic Review on Stroke Research, published in Stem Cells Cloning (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Stem Cells Cloning