Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A thermoresponsive cationic block copolymer brush-grafted silica bead interface for temperature-modulated separation of adipose-derived stem cells.

Nagase K., Okada A., Matsuda J., Ichikawa D., Hattori Y., Kanazawa H.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, published in Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36257279
DOI
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112928
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) have beneficial effects in cell transplantation therapy; these cells are collected from adipose tissue using low-invasive methods. However, to prepare ADSCs for cell therapy, a cell separation method that neither involves modification of the cell surface nor causes loss of cell activity is needed. Here, we aimed to develop ADSC separation columns using thermoresponsive cationic block copolymer brush-grafted beads as packing materials. The block copolymer brush was formed by a bottom cationic segment, poly(N,N-dimethylaminopropylacrylamide) (PDMAPAAm), and an upper thermoresponsive segment, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm), and was grafted in two atom transfer radical polymerization reactions. The copolymer brush-grafted silica beads were packed into a column. An ADSC suspension was introduced into the columns at 37 °C and adsorbed on the copolymer brush-modified beads through electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions with the PDMAPAAm and PNIPAAm segments, respectively. The adsorbed ADSCs eluted from the column by lowering the temperature to 4 °C. In contrast, most Jurkat and vascular endothelial cells eluted at 37 °C, because of the relatively weaker electrostatic interactions with the block copolymer brush compared to ADSCs. Using the prepared column, a mixture of ADSCs and Jurkat cells was separated by changing the column

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
HumansSilicon DioxideTemperatureEndothelial CellsSurface PropertiesPolymersCationsAdipose TissueMesenchymal Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research