Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Techniques in Skin Regeneration: Current Insights and Future Perspectives

Di Stefano AB., Urrata V., Schilders K., Franza M., Di Leo S., Moschella F.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Life (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Life (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40430214
PMCID
PMC12113422
DOI
10.3390/life15050787
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Skin is composed of three layers: the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. It is enriched with skin appendages, including hair follicles, sweat glands, and sebaceous glands, which play essential roles in regulating fluid exchange, controlling body temperature, and providing protection against pathogens. Currently, skin regeneration treatments rely on transplantations. However, this approach has several disadvantages, including hemostasis at the recipient site, limitations in donor area closure, increased graft contraction, and hypertrophic scarring. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies have enabled the fabrication of structures that closely mimic native tissues, with the aim of enhancing tissue regeneration. Bioprinting offers several advantages, such as high reproducibility, precision, and the ability to create complex geometries. The most promising bioinks combine excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, with mechanical and rheological stability. This review highlights the most recent and innovative studies on 3D-printed bioinks in the field of skin tissue engineering. In particular, considering the growing interest in the regenerative potential of exosomes, we discuss cutting-edge research involving exosome-loaded bioinks and their potential to support skin regeneration and repair.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research