Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Three-Dimensional Multilayered Microstructure Using Needle Array Bioprinting System

Shudo Y., MacArthur JW., Kunitomi Y., Joubert L., Kawamura M., Ono J.

Laboratory Study, published in Tissue Eng Part A (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Tissue Eng Part A (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32085692
PMCID
PMC7476375
DOI
10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0313
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Tissue engineering is an essential component of developing effective regenerative therapies. In this study, we introduce a promising method to create scaffold-free three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineered multilayered microstructures from cultured cells using the "3D tissue fabrication system" (Regenova ® ; Cyfuse, Tokyo, Japan). This technique utilizes the adhesive nature of cells. When cells are cultured in nonadhesive wells, they tend to aggregate and form a spheroidal structure. The advantage of this approach is that cellular components can be mixed into one spheroid, thereby promoting the formation of extracellular matrices, such as collagen and elastin. This system enables one to create a predesigned 3D structure composed of cultured cells. We found that the advantages of this system to be (1) the length, size, and shape of the structure that were designable and highly reproducible because of the computer controlled robotics system, (2) the graftable structure could be created within a reasonable period (8 days), and (3) the constructed tissue did not contain any foreign material, which may avoid the potential issues of contamination, biotoxicity, and allergy. The utilization of this robotic system enabled the creation of a 3D multilayered microstructure made of cell-based spheres with a satisfactory mechanical properties and abundant extracellular matrix during a short p

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Extracellular MatrixHumansTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBioprintingPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.