Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Three-dimensional printed bioresorbable scaffold for maxillofacial bone reconstruction: A Scoping Review

Malzoni CMA., Oliveira JA., Soares LFF., Chimirri MC., Almeida DAF., Pigossi SC.

Clinical Trial on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Braz Dent J (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Braz Dent J (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39476112
PMCID
PMC11506235
DOI
10.1590/0103-6440202406112

Abstract (original English)

This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of current advancements in virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds, and to evaluate their clinical outcomes in maxillofacial reconstructive surgeries. Electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted for publications up to June 2024. Included in the review were reports evaluating patients who underwent maxillofacial bone defect reconstruction using virtual planning and custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds. Data on postoperative complications, new bone formation, scaffold resorption, dental implant success/survival, and patient satisfaction were collected. The electronic search found 5799 results (3438 unique citations). A total of 54 studies were evaluated for full-text reading, of which 41 were excluded based on the inclusion criteria. Thirteen studies (6 case reports, 5 case series, one prospective clinical study and one randomized clinical trial) were included. These studies assessed the effectiveness of 3D-printed scaffolds in reconstructing maxillofacial defects, bone augmentation for dental implant placement, and regeneration of periosseous defects. Most of the 3D-printed scaffolds were biocompatible and did not cause local or systemic adverse events. However, some postoperative complications were reported, including graft expo

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
HumansAbsorbable ImplantsTissue ScaffoldsPrinting, Three-DimensionalPlastic Surgery Procedures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research