Tissue engineering.
Arosarena O.
Narrative Review, published in Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2005) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (2005)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 16012248
- DOI
- 10.1097/01.moo.0000170526.51393.c5
Abstract (original English)
Regenerative medicine holds promise for the restoration of tissues and organs damaged by wear, trauma, neoplasm, or congenital deformity. Tissue engineering combines the disciplines of cell biology and biomedical engineering to effect the design and maturation of various tissues. Despite progress in some areas of tissue regeneration, there has not been significant translation to clinical practice. This article reviews the present understanding of and advances in regenerative medicine, as well as describing limitations in current techniques and areas that need further development. A discussion of the state of the art in the regeneration of skin, cartilage, bone, adipose tissue, and neural tissue is included. Differences between extracorporeal and in-vitro tissue engineering are discussed, as well as tissue engineering principles, including the use of bioactive scaffolds, progenitor cells and stem cells, the need for cellular and tissue patterning, microcirculation development, and the use of external stimuli for differentiation. Much needs to be learned about progenitor cell biology, cell-cell interactions, cellular interactions with the extracellular matrix, and about the cues needed for differentiation of functional tissues. The current limitations in regenerative medicine techniques and the gaps in current knowledge of cellular biology and tissue development represent signifi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.