Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Tissue engineering craniofacial defects with adult stem cells? Are we ready yet?

Zuk PA.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Pediatr Res (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Pediatr Res (2008)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
18427291
DOI
10.1203/PDR.0b013e31816bdf36
Citations
73

Abstract (original English)

Over three-quarters of all craniofacial defects observed in the US per year are cleft palates. Usually involving significant bony defects in both the hard palate and alveolar process of the maxilla, repair of these defects is typically performed surgically using autologous bone grafts taken from appropriate sites (i.e., iliac crest). However, surgical intervention is not without its complications. As such, the reconstructive surgeon has turned to the scientist and engineer for help. In this review, the application of the field of tissue engineering to craniofacial defects (e.g., cleft palates) is discussed. Specifically the use of adult stem cells, such as mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and Adipose-derived Stem Cells (ASCs) in combination with currently available biomaterials is presented in the context of healing craniofacial defects like the cleft palate. Finally, future directions with regards to the use of ASCs in craniofacial repair are discussed, including possible scaffold-driven and gene-driven approaches.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adult Stem CellsBiomimeticsCraniofacial AbnormalitiesHumansSignal TransductionTissue Engineering

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research