Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The tissue origin effect of extracellular vesicles on cartilage and bone regeneration.

Li Q., Yu H., Sun M., Yang P., Hu X., Ao Y.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Acta Biomater (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Acta Biomater (2021)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33657452
DOI
10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.039

Abstract (original English)

Direct implantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for cartilage and bone tissue engineering faces challenges, such as immune rejection and loss of cellular viability or functionality. As nanoscale natural particles, exosomes or small extracellular vesicles (EVs) of MSCs have potential to circumvent these problems. It is significant to investigate the impact of the tissue origin of MSCs on the therapeutic bioactivity of their corresponding EVs for cartilage and bone regeneration. Here, rat MSCs isolated from the adipose, bone marrow, and synovium are cultured to obtain their corresponding EVs (ADSC-EVs, BMSC-EVs, and SMSC-EVs, respectively). The ADSC-EVs stimulate the migration, proliferation, and chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro as well as cartilage and bone regeneration in a mouse model more than the BMSC-EVs or SMSC-EVs. Proteomics analysis reveals that the tissue origin contributes to the distinct protein profiles among the three types of EVs, which induced cartilage and bone regenerative capacities by potential mechanisms of regulating signaling pathways including focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interaction, actin cytoskeleton, cAMP, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways. Consequently, these findings provide insight that the adipose may be a superior candidate in EV-based nanomedicine for cartilage and bone regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Ext

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBone RegenerationCartilageCell DifferentiationChondrogenesisExtracellular VesiclesMiceOsteogenesisPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesRats

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research