Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Topographical design principles for osteochondral tissue engineering

Aboal-Castro L., Kolliopoulos VK., Alvarez-Lorenzo C., Mikos AG., Diaz-Gomez L.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Bioact Mater (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioact Mater (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42011200
PMCID
PMC13091945
DOI
10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.04.010
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

The osteochondral unit has a complex hierarchical structure where cartilage and subchondral bone show different physical, chemical, and functional properties. Replicating this structure remains a major challenge in osteochondral tissue engineering. Among various scaffold design factors, surface topography has emerged as a powerful regulator of cell behavior, but its rational integration into osteochondral constructs is still limited. This review systematically explores how topographical features affect cartilage and bone regeneration, focusing especially on feature size and anisotropy. Evidence across in vitro and in vivo studies indicates that nanoscale topographies better support chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage-like extracellular matrix formation by resembling natural cartilage, with isotropic features helping maintain chondrocyte shape. In contrast, microscale features tend to promote osteogenic differentiation, mineralization, and bone tissue organization, although osteogenic responses have also been observed on certain nanoscale topographies that mimic trabecular bone spaces. Anisotropic topographies further improve tissue-specific responses by guiding cell alignment and promoting organized matrix deposition across both cartilage and bone regions. Overall, these results highlight surface topography as a key design parameter for coordinating osteochondral regener

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research