Total lower lip and chin replantation following a trampoline accident: Rescue surgery with intensive leech therapy.
Sounthakith V., Schweitzer-Chaput A., Picard A., Prebot J., Galland A., Neiva-Vaz C.
Case Report / Series, published in J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Case Report / Series
- Journal
- J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg (2026)
- Country
- France
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 41513071
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jormas.2026.102709
Abstract (original English)
Lip amputations in children may require urgent microsurgical management. Here we report a salvage procedure with partial survival following lower lip and chin replantation after a trampoline accident. Total amputation was managed with inferior labial artery anastomosis; however, venous drainage was not reestablished, necessitating leech therapy. Despite arterial revisions, 75 % of the lip and 25 % of the chin were lost by post-operative day 14. Reconstruction with a combined right Karapandzic flap and left Camille Bernard flap was performed one month later, supplemented by mesotherapy and nanofat injections. The outcome was marked by residual microstomia. These injuries are rare in children, often caused by dog bites. Venous anastomosis is frequently unfeasible, with leech therapy critical for drainage. When replantation is partially successful, reconstruction may involve local flaps or free tissue transfers. Microsurgical expertise, access to leech therapy and close collaboration with intensivists are essential for optimizing outcomes.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.