Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Toward a Consensus View of Mammalian Adipocyte Stem and Progenitor Cell Heterogeneity.

Ferrero R., Rainer P., Deplancke B.

Narrative Review, published in Trends Cell Biol (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Trends Cell Biol (2020)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33148396
DOI
10.1016/j.tcb.2020.09.007
Citations
98

Abstract (original English)

White adipose tissue (WAT) is a cellularly heterogeneous endocrine organ that not only serves as an energy reservoir, but also actively participates in metabolic homeostasis. Among the main constituents of adipose tissue are adipocytes, which arise from adipose stem and progenitor cells (ASPCs). While it is well known that these ASPCs reside in the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue, their molecular heterogeneity and functional diversity is still poorly understood. Driven by the resolving power of single-cell transcriptomics, several recent studies provided new insights into the cellular complexity of ASPCs among different mammalian fat depots. In this review, we present current knowledge on ASPCs, their population structure, hierarchy, fat depot-specific nature, function, and regulatory mechanisms, and discuss not only the similarities, but also the differences between mouse and human ASPC biology.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipogenesisAnimalsHumansMammalsObesityStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.