Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Transcriptomic and functional comparison of adipose-and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for tendon regeneration.

Khaled H., Zayed M., Kim B., Jeong BH., Oh SI.

Animal Study on Tendon Injury, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2026)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41957779
DOI
10.1186/s13287-026-04961-2

Abstract (original English)

Tendons are specialized connective tissues with limited intrinsic healing properties due to hypovascularity and low metabolic activity. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess regenerative potential for tendon injuries. Among the diverse sources of MSCs, those derived from the bone marrow (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue (AD-MSCs) are the leading candidates. However, their relative efficacy remains underexplored, particularly in terms of biological characteristics and tenogenic differentiation. In addition, the signaling pathways driving tenogenic differentiation processes remain poorly understood. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the regenerative potential of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs for tendon repair. AD- and BM-MSCs were isolated from rats and evaluated for stemness based on morphology, viability, immunophenotyping, and tri-lineage differentiation. RNA sequencing was performed to obtain a baseline molecular profile of each MSC type prior to tenogenic differentiation. We evaluated the potential of AD- and BM-MSCs to differentiate into tendon-like cells in vitro using gene expression and immunofluorescence. A rat model of Achilles tendon injury was created to evaluate the regenerative efficacy following each MSC-type injection. After 6 weeks, tendon regeneration was assessed using histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Both MSCs displayed similarities in morphology

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsMesenchymal Stem CellsRatsAdipose TissueRegenerationBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationTendon InjuriesTranscriptomeRats, Sprague-Dawley

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research