Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Transcriptomic heterogeneity of cultured ADSCs corresponds to embolic risk in the host.

Yan K., Zhang J., Yin W., Harding JN., Ma F., Wu D.

Laboratory Study on Systemic / IV, published in iScience (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
iScience (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35992088
PMCID
PMC9389247
DOI
10.1016/j.isci.2022.104822
Citations
8

Abstract (original English)

Stem cell therapy emerges as an effective approach for treating various currently untreatable diseases. However, fatal and unknown risks caused by their systemic use remain to be a major obstacle to clinical application. We developed a functional single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) procedure and identified that transcriptomic heterogeneity of adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) in cultures is responsible for a fatal embolic risk of these cells in the host. The pro-embolic subpopulation of ADSCs in cultures was sorted by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and verified by a supervised machine learning analysis. A mathematical model was developed and validated for the prediction of embolic risk of cultured ADSCs in animal models and further confirmed by its application to public data. Importantly, modification of culture conditions prevented the embolic risk. This novel procedure can be applied to other aspects of risk assessment and would help further the development of stem cell clinical applications.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research