Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review

Vladova D.

Narrative Review, published in J Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Dev Biol (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41892812
PMCID
PMC13027023
DOI
10.3390/jdb14010014

Abstract (original English)

Bone tissue is among the most commonly transplanted tissues worldwide. The treatment of critical-sized bone defects remains a significant challenge, as there is currently no universally accepted experimental model or therapeutic standard. Recent advances in fundamental cell biology are driving a paradigm shift in approaches to bone regeneration, highlighting the transformative potential of biofabrication technologies that integrate tissue engineering with personalized regenerative strategies. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology enables precise control over the architecture and spatial distribution of cellular and biologically active components, facilitating the creation of complex, personalized bone constructs. Central to this process are bioinks and biomaterials that mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) and provide an optimal microenvironment for cellular function. Despite the substantial body of accumulated data, a comprehensive theoretical framework for functional bone biofabrication has not yet been fully established, emphasizing both the challenges and the innovative potential of the field. This integrative review synthesizes current knowledge on bone biology-from embryogenesis and cell-matrix interactions to molecular and neural regulation-and links it to the opportunities offered by biofabrication. Particular attention is given to bioinks as mediators between c

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.