Translation of genome-wide association study: from genomic signals to biological insights
Bruner WS., Grant SFA.
Narrative Review, published in Front Genet (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Genet (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39421299
- PMCID
- PMC11484060
- DOI
- 10.3389/fgene.2024.1375481
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Since the turn of the 21st century, genome-wide association study (GWAS) have successfully identified genetic signals associated with a myriad of common complex traits and diseases. As we transition from establishing robust genetic associations with diverse phenotypes, the central challenge is now focused on characterizing the underlying functional mechanisms driving these signals. Previous GWAS efforts have revealed multiple variants, each conferring relatively subtle susceptibility, collectively contributing to the pathogenesis of various common diseases. Such variants can further exhibit associations with multiple other traits and differ across ancestries, plus disentangling causal variants from non-causal due to linkage disequilibrium complexities can lead to challenges in drawing direct biological conclusions. Combined with cellular context considerations, such challenges can reduce the capacity to definitively elucidate the biological significance of GWAS signals, limiting the potential to define mechanistic insights. This review will detail current and anticipated approaches for functional interpretation of GWAS signals, both in terms of characterizing the underlying causal variants and the corresponding effector genes.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.